As tensions rise between the two nations, Chinese sales are already falling and Japanese suppliers are already pulling out of China
The Chinese vehicle market grew in September on a month-on-month basis but sales were down 1.8% year-on-year (y/y). The CAAM has stated that there were three main reasons for the y/y sales decline in September. First, the escalating tensions between Japan and China regarding ownership of the uninhabited but mineral-rich Diaoyu Islands in the East China Seas have led to rising nationalist sentiment in China. This resulted in riots in September and led to a sudden drop in demand for Japanese-brand vehicles, which dampened overall sales during the month. Japanese brands' sales dropped 29% y/y in September, the CAAM states.
The sudden drop in Japanese OEM brand sales in the country has hit Japanese automotive parts suppliers in China. In the immediate aftermath of the riots in China last month, Japanese automakers have seen plummeting sales and have reduced production as suppliers adjust production at their Chinese plants. The Nikkei reports that Topre Corp, which makes car bodies, has cut production at its plant in Foshan in Guangdong province by half. Meanwhile, transmission parts-maker Musashi Seimitsu has reduced the number of hours of production per day at its plant in Guangdong province.
IHS Automotive contacted auto-parts supplier Denso and spokesperson Goro Kanemaso said, "We are adjusting our production based on our customers' production." Denso has plants across China in which it will adjust production accordingly. Despite Denso having expanded its customer base beyond just Japanese OEMs, its major customers are still Japanese automakers. In China, Denso's customers include Guangzhou Toyota, FAW Toyota, Guangzhou Honda Automobile, Dongfeng Honda, Shanghai GM, and Changan Ford.
Japanese auto-parts suppliers in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong will likely be the hardest hit from the sudden drop in production as the province is a hub of Japanese-brand vehicle production plants. Many Japanese parts suppliers in the region solely rely on orders from Japanese automakers. With Toyota expected to reduce production by half in October 2012, its suppliers are immediately affected. The Nikkei reports that Japanese auto-parts suppliers have more than 440 production bases in China, mainly for supplying Japanese automakers. In 2011 Japanese suppliers were hit by supply chain disruptions due to the tsunami and earthquake of March that year, prompting many suppliers to accelerate plans to expand in China to limit future supply chain disruptions, but the situation this year will again affect these Japanese suppliers. In 2011 Denso, for example, expanded and relocated an HVAC plant in Guangzhou in China's Guangdong province. Japanese supplier Toro has recently decided to reconsider its Chinese expansion.
The sudden decline in Japanese brands' sales in the Chinese passenger vehicle market has seriously dented overall market growth this year. The political tension between Japan and China regarding ownership of the Diaoyu Islands resulted in riots in China last month targeting Japanese-brand goods and in particular Japanese-brand vehicles. The result was that Japanese automakers suddenly stopped production and closed their plants in late September, resulting in a dramatic drop in production and darkening the outlook for the months to come. Japanese OEMs have now reopened their plants following the week-long National Day holiday in China that lasted from 1 to 7 October, but all are running limited operations as inventories at dealerships pile up.
IHS Automotive forecasts that Japanese automakers will lose around 20% of their annual sales in China this year, but it is difficult to predict how fast other automakers will be able to steal their lost market share. Hyundai, for example, has already ramped up its production capacity in China and has expanded production of its best-selling Elantra model to 20,000 units per month from 15,000. However, German and US brands are most likely to benefit from the woes of the Japanese brands thanks to their better positioning in China in terms of brand awareness. Thus the passenger vehicle segment is still forecast to see sales growth this year of around 7% as the market share lost by the Japanese OEMs is likely to be taken up by the likes of Volkswagen (VW) and General Motors (GM), says Lin Huaibin, IHS Automotive's China light-vehicle sales forecast manager. Ford and South Korean automakers Hyundai and Kia are also strengthening their brand images and product line-ups in China and they too will take some of the sales lost by the Japanese OEMs.
It is less easy for production levels at plants to suddenly be increased and this may result in some lost output in China in the coming months. In order to produce models OEMs need to finalise their component volumes well in advance so that their tier-one suppliers and the entire supply chain can adjust accordingly. The tensions between Japan and China have only recently escalated and the sudden reduction in production by Japanese cannot necessarily be offset by increased volume production at other OEMs.
In 2011 automakers ramped up production in China, specifically Japanese automakers, which had seen dramatic parts shortages hampering production levels in China as a result of the tsunami and earthquake that hit Japan in March last year, causing damage to a long list of suppliers and therefore disrupting Japanese OEMs' supply chain. This high base of comparison is one reason why production and sales in September suffered a y/y decline. All Japanese OEMs reported lower sales in September and suppliers to these automakers are now looking at their production levels and adjusting them in line with the reduced demand.
Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.
These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.
THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.
The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.