The political backlash to A123's deal with China's Wanxiang Group is one of the reasons behind the distressed sale of its operations.

U.S. Government-backed lithium-ion battery producer A123 Systems has filed for bankruptcy protection after failing to make interest payments on outstanding notes. The company had previously said it had run out of cash and was set to skip the scheduled payments.

Separately, the company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Johnson Controls under which, the latter promised to buy A123's automotive business assets for a consideration of USD125 million. Johnson Controls will also acquire A123's production facilities in Livonia and Romulus, Michigan; its cathode powder manufacturing facilities in China, and its equity interest in Shanghai Advanced Traction Battery – a joint venture with Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC). Nearly 600 are employed at the Romulus and Livonia plants and an office in Ann Arbor. A123 will receive USD72.5 million in "debtor in possession" financing from Johnson Controls to support its operations during bankruptcy. Johnson Controls operates a battery production factory in Holland, Michigan, employing 100 workers.

Now the company is left with grid and commercial businesses under which it supplies energy storage solutions to power plants and power tool market. A123 said it is "encouraged by the significant interest" it has received from multiple parties for these businesses without disclosing names. However, these businesses are substantially smaller as compared to the automotive business.

The company rose to prominence after winning millions in venture funding and USD249 million in green energy grants from the US Department of Energy. In addition, the company was a major recipient of grants from the state of Michigan which pledged to be at the forefront of the advancements in battery development. A123 came with its initial public offering (IPO) in September 2009 raising over USD380 million, helped partially by the government backing and its roots to MIT. However, the capital intensive nature of the business meant the company never reported a profit in its 11-year existence.

Failed deal with Wanxiang

In August, A123 signed an agreement with Chinese supplier Wanxiang Group to sell 80% stake for a total consideration of USD465 million. The agreement never materialised as the company did not get required regulatory approvals in time – partially attributable to the political backlash regarding government investments taken over by a Chinese company. "We determined not to move forward with the previously announced Wanxiang agreement as a result of unanticipated and significant challenges to its completion," A123 chief executive David Vieau said in a statement.

Outlook and implications

The move, though not completely surprising, comes as a big jolt to the emerging hybrid and electric vehicle (EV) market. A123 Systems' bankruptcy filing is indicative of the fundamental issues with the approach of having specialist suppliers in a nascent and slow-moving industry. Despite counting GM, BMW and Fisker among its clients and the US Department of Energy as one of the backers, A123 Systems' failure is a testimony of hard business realities where start-up cost outflows often more than offset the revenue and grant inflows. This can also be viewed as a grim reminder to specialist automakers such as Tesla and Fisker which are also chasing a limited market and are encountering similar cashflow challenges. A well-funded company like A123 going under could once again herald an era of OEMs keeping production of such critical components to themselves instead of relying on third parties. After having to issue a recall of Karma plug-in vehicles due to faulty batteries supplied by A123, EV start-up Fisker Automotive has said it will explore other options for sourcing batteries.

For Johnson Controls, the transaction is a big positive as it gets A123's automotive business for a fraction of what Wanxiang would have paid had the deal gone through. The transaction at distressed valuations further allude there may not have been many buyers in the market. The transaction also gels well with Johnson Controls' plans of broadening its spectrum of battery technologies. Johnson Controls dissolved its joint venture in May last year with French partner Saft Group as it wanted to have access to multiple alternative technologies even as new markets emerge for advanced batteries and vehicle powertrain technologies. Johnson Controls is one of the largest players in the lead-acid battery market and its diversified business model can cope with the challenges in the still emerging lithium-ion battery space.

A123 Systems has got an approval from the Delaware bankruptcy court to secure an interim loan of USD15.5 million from Johnson Controls. The financing received the court's nod after Johnson Controls reduced the interest rate to 13.5% from the earlier pitch for 15%. A123 Systems will ask approval for the remaining portion of the USD72.5 million loan in the court on 30 October 2012. The substantially low valuation of A123 Systems' business may prompt Wanxiang or other companies to bring a competing offer which in turn could force Johnson Controls to sweeten its offer. Johnson Controls has successfully acquired and turned around many businesses in the past and this, along with the benefit of being a US company, is likely to go in its favour.

Contacts

Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.

THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.

The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.