A new breed of executive is taking over the purchasing operations at the three Detroit automakers and bringing about important changes in OEM-supplier relations

One-by-one, engineering executives have moved into the top procurement jobs and they are focusing more on integration of parts procurement with product development and smooth launches, than slashing piece prices.

True, not all supplier executives agree with that assessment. But there is a clear, measurable difference in the way they view their American customers compared to a decade ago, when relations were far more contentious.

The latest move in this direction is the departure at the Ford Motor Co., which last week announced the retirement of Tony Brown, Ford’s global purchasing boss since 2002. Brown, 57, has been replaced by Hau Thai-Tang, who had been the company's engineering chief.

Thai-Tang is representative of the new group of purchasing leaders at the Detroit Three. They are career engineering and product development executives, not professional parts-buying titans who have spent their entire working lives in the purchasing organizations of their companies.

The trend is noteworthy and the impact on suppliers is significant. A more collaborative style among the Detroiters is obvious from the results of SupplierBusiness OEM-relations sampling and in other surveys.

Brown was a former supply chain executive at United Technologies Automotive, before joining Ford in 1999. Thai-Tang, 46, who was born in Vietnam, ran Ford’s global product programmes before becoming head of engineering. His resumé also included responsibility for Ford’s SVT high performance group and the launch of the 2005 Mustang. Earlier in his career he was a race engineer for  Nigel Mansell and Mario Andretti.

That’s not your garden variety purchasing czar. Indeed, Thai-Tang had been pegged as a rock star in the product engineering realm, which in the past would have never put him on a path to purchasing at a Detroit Three company.

Grace Lieblein, GM’s new top purchasing executive, had never worked in purchasing before taking her current post late last year. She began to draw attention as the chief engineer on the GMC Acadia and Buick Enclave crossovers that arrived in 2007 and then moved to the top job at GM Mexico in January 2009.

Later, as the company’s top executive in Brazil, she developed a reputation for supply chain expertise while GM do Brasil launched nine new models in under two years. She won high marks for integrating purchasing and logistics with product development globally. GM executives have lavished praise on the way Lieblein brought the two disciplines together in Brazil.

In her new job as global purchasing boss, she focused initially on a smooth execution of the launch of the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups. It was Lieblein who called in retired GM engineers to work with suppliers to make sure nothing went astray as the crucial full-sized pickups went into production.

Some Detroit industry-watchers say the current trend toward accomplished engineering executives running purchasing began with the appointment of the late Dan Knott as Chrysler’s procurement boss. Knott, who died last year, had been a product development executive at Chrysler and injected a strong sense of supplier partnership when he was named head of purchasing in 2009.

Knott had been a pure product guy before taking over the job. He had helped create SRT models including the Dodge Viper, Jeep Grand Cherokee and Chrysler 300C.

His successor was Scott Kunselman, who had been head of engineering at Chrysler. Kunselman’s approach also is typical of the new breed. Indeed, teams of Chrysler engineers are working closely with 10 suppliers to improve their productivity.

But Knott set the tone at Chrysler, just as two other executives played key roles in changing the purchasing culture at the other Detroit automakers.

One is GM North American President Mark Reuss, who returned from the top job at Holden in Australia three years ago to become GM’s head of engineering. In that position, he immediately instituted monthly meetings with suppliers to work out issues upstream. As the President of GM North America, his current position, Reuss brought his influence to bear on veteran purchasing executive Bob Socia, Lieblein's predecessor.

The other major change agent in the turnaround of Detroit Three supplier relations was Ford CEO Alan Mulally, who carried over his legendary supplier relations expertise from Boeing when he moved to Ford in 2006. Many suppliers say that it was Mulally, more than Tony Brown, who brought about the positive cultural change in Ford purchasing in recent years.

Contacts

Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.

THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.

The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.