Company looking for USD2billion deal

Reports this week have suggested that Bain Capital LLC is in advanced talks to acquire auto parts supplier TI Automotive in a deal approaching USD2 billion. It is the buyout firm's second attempt to buy TI Automotive in the last two years.

News of the potential deal marks a return of private equity money to the automotive industry. In late 2011, Bain was one of the three private equity firms vying for TI Automotive, which makes fuel tanks as well as braking and powertrain components. The sale fell through as financing conditions deteriorated then, but TI Automotive was put on sale again during this summer.

The other two private equity firms that were vying for TI Automotive in 2011 were Carlyle Group LP and Pamplona Capital Management LLP. TI Automotive was picked up by a consortium of hedge funds led by Oaktree Capital Group LLC and Duquesne Capital Management LLC in a 2007 debt restructuring. Hedge fund veteran Stanley Druckenmiller wound down Duquesne in 2010.

Whether this will lead to increased activity from private equity remains to be seen. Much has changed since the global recession of 2008, which saw automakers and suppliers reaching out for sources of cash as lending tightened. In addition, many private equity firms were burned by their experiences in the automotive supply chain; Ripplewood Holdings listed affiliate RHJ International put USD60 million into Metaldyne Corp., which filed for bankruptcy in 2009 after its portfolio company Asahi Tec acquired it. Goldman Sachs and Cypress Group also sank USD318 million of equity into their 2007 purchase of Cooper-Standard.

Generally, the automotive industry is not very attractive for PE firms due to the cyclical nature of business and the low rate of return. PE-owned suppliers are not popular among automakers as they are less willing to capitulate to increasing pricing pressure by OEMs and will fight vehemently for price rises in components supplied to the customers. They are viewed suspiciously by the unions as most of the time they implement ruthless restructuring processes, resulting in huge job losses after acquisition.

They also create uncertainty for OEMs, as private equity firms are generally looking for short term gains and are more likely to leave the industry at the very first opportunity.

More likely though is that this is a one-off deal. As well as the collapsed deal in 2011, TI Automotive had recently reached out to other private equity firms as well as companies in its sector but found little interest. Also, it is not entirely clear if Bain is the only party currently in talks with TI Automotive, which sought second-round bids by late October.

TI Automotive has seen a recovery in its bottom line. The company has earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of around USD400 million, compared with some USD250 million when it was for sale two years ago.

Other private equity deals in the last 12 months involving automotive suppliers include;

Contacts

Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.

THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.

The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.