As OEMs look for access to technology or volume planning, OEMs are taking greater steps to protect and aid their suppliers

Toyota plans to be less aggressive with parts suppliers during price negotiations for the first half of fiscal year (FY) 2014/15, mainly to help companies that stood by it in difficult times, reports financial daily The Nikkei. The automaker aims to use the gentler price reduction to strengthen the health of not only its top tier of suppliers, but also smaller companies. Toyota will reportedly ask for a price cut of less than 1% for the first half of next FY against a typical reduction of 1.0-1.5%, given favourable exchange rates, economic trends and other factors.

With the yen's sustained weakening against the US dollar opening up the prospect of all-time high profits at Toyota for the current FY ending in March, it can afford to protect the small and mid-size component suppliers – numbering in the hundreds – that derive most of their revenues in Japan and benefit less from exports.

The gesture is commendable given that Toyota is under pressure to agree to its union's wage demands in light of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's call for corporate Japan to raise wages to mitigate the impact of the planned sales tax rise in April, even though vehicle sales are expected to slow following the increase. Toyota asked for a 3% price cut in 2011 and 2012, when the yen was strong and the company faced parent-only operating losses. By asking for a smaller price cut, Toyota is looking to maintain an unrivalled component supply cluster at home – a critical factor in the automaker's commitment to produce a minimum of thre million vehicles annually in Japan.

News of the softening of Toyota’s stance comes a few weeks after General Motors rolled back a number of terms and agreements with its suppliers that were seen as unfavourable for the supply base. GM is also reportedly offering to help suppliers identify waste, forecast costs, reduce raw-material costs, and look for other ways to reduce costs. After several years of profitability being largely attributable to increasing transaction prices, GM has shifted to a programme aimed at driving cost out of the systems and stepping toward working more closely with suppliers to jointly find and eliminate inefficiencies and reduce costs.

GM has also launched a Strategic Supplier Engagement programme, seen as purchasing chief Grace Lieblein’s move to improve relations with suppliers. The programme will offer such perks as better access to GM purchasing staff, increased and earlier access to GM's product and technology plans, and even training to those suppliers that rate highly on certain metrics. The programme is designed to appeal to those suppliers further down the chain and as a means of appeasing suppliers as GM looks to accessing the supply base's best innovations.

Whether it be for access to technology or security of volume planning, it’s increasingly clear that OEMs are granting more leverage to the automotive supply base.

Contacts

Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.

THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.

The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.