Differing strategies have emerged between software companies and automotive OEMs / suppliers

The widely reported news that Chinese web-services company Baidu plans to launch a self-driving car in China by the end of the year has not come as a surprise to the industry. Wang Jin, Baidu's senior vice-president, was quoted as saying that the company would launch a self-driving car (SDC) prototype with BMW in 2015. The executive added that the prototype car would be used to test the road-readiness of Baidu's technology but would still have driver controls.

Baidu teamed up with the BMW Group last year for a research project which envisaged self-driving vehicles operated on urban highways in Beijing and Shanghai. Baidu offers similar services to rival Google and is China's largest search engine. As well as the self-driving vehicle project, the company has formed collaborations with several automakers for connected-car technology and has been reported to be considering buying Nokia's map business.

The announcement that the company is looking to launch an autonomous vehicle this year is ambitious. Even Google, whose interest in autonomous vehicles has long been documented, is only just this summer starting on-road testing of its prototype self-driving car. Google has built 25 vehicles that it will take to the streets around its offices in California, United States. The company’s latest iteration of its prototype vehicle uses the same software as its test fleet of Lexus RX 450h vehicles, though with more sensors. The new autonomous prototype the company is set to use has been custom built with incorporated sensors, whereas previously its sensors were added onto a standard Lexus. The Google prototype is limited to 25mph and Google drivers will have a detachable steering wheel, accelerator pedal and brake pedal to take over control as necessary.

Google maintains that this is a research project and not development of a specific production vehicle. It seems clear that the autonomous question is if, not when; results of this and other projects advancing the technology rapidly, though true consumer demand is less certain. However, though Google is in the driving seat in terms of development, they are unlikely to be producing the necessary physical parts for any autonomous driving system. Instead their opportunity is likely to come in licensing software they develop, for which they need to be first to market, hence an aggressive 2017 target. Google is less interested in being a vehicle manufacturer than it is preparing the landscape for change and then enabling it by taking care of the tougher part of the development, or the software.

The announcement by Baidu highlights the openness of the term “autonomous”. The head of Baidu's deep learning lab Yu Kai has previously said that that the company is not looking, as Google is, at completely autonomous car, looking instead to develop a vehicle that will retain the traditional pedals but give the driver greater freedom. To consumers, the idea of autonomous vehicles is being defined by tech companies, that being as a vehicle that completely drives itself, without human intervention. Anything less does not count as autonomous.

Most automakers at this stage are following a different strategy of incremental advances in automation to augment or relieve the driver of more and more driving tasks until the car becomes self-driving, rather than leaping straight to full autonomy as Google and Baidu are aiming to do. Almost all have their own autonomous vehicle projects, and are quietly working on the other aspects that build towards it, such as active safety. The last few months have seen a number of automakers announce progress on autonomous vehicles projects, including Audi, Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.

The differing strategies also have differing timelines for the introduction of fully autonomous vehicles to the market. Continental spokespersons have indicated the company believes 2025 is the earliest SDCs will be seen on the road. Google’s Sergey Brin told The New York Times: "[advances by traditional suppliers] seems not entirely in keeping with our mission of being transformative."

The shift of R&D responsibilities onto suppliers – once seen as a strategy by OEMs to transfer a costly element of auto production – has proved beneficial as tier ones find themselves market leaders in a number of key technologies. OEMs are only just starting to play catch-up, while the major suppliers are now ploughing as much as 5% of revenue back into R&D. Baidu and Google has the opportunity to take advantage of this swing by doing the development for a self-driving vehicle. However for the project to really work, it needs to be first to market.

Google has stopped short of saying it was looking to license its self-driving technology, with its car is still in the research phase. If a traditional automaker can develop the systems necessary to commercialise a self-driving car ahead of or on a similar timeframe as Google, they may be less likely to fabricate a vehicle for the technology giant. However, there are automakers with fewer resources; for one of them, assembling for Google could get them into a sector they might not otherwise be able to get a foothold in.

IHS Automotive forecasts the first self-driving cars (SDCs) will be on the road before 2025, which would be Level 4, able to be controlled by the driver; Level 5 SDC-only cars are forecast to appear about 2035. We forecast the first SDC cars will have a global market share of about 9% by 2035 and 90% by 2055 − from 230,000 in 2025 to 11.8 million in 2035 (Level 4 and Level 5).

Contacts

Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.

THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.

The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.