Suppliers believe smart seating projects as key to the development of self-driving cars

China is set to become the biggest seat market for Adient over the next five years, according to CEO Bruce McDonald. The company, that previously formed the automotive seating and interiors business for Johnson Controls, is set to take the majority of the country’s seat assembly market according to IHS Automotive forecasts.

McDonald also sees self-driving cars and electric vehicles (EVs) could provide an opportunity for the company to increase revenues, McDonald told Reuters in a recent interview. Among the company's newest customers are two California-based EV makers – Tesla Motors and start-up Atieva. “As demand shifts to vehicles with more premium content, and from sedans to crossover vehicles, Adient should see revenues expand, even as overall vehicle demand slows,” McDonald said. He added, "The migration of high-end features such as cooling seats with massage functions to mass market vehicles and the growth of SUVs and CUVs should be big tailwinds for us."   

Moreover, McDonald believes the shift in demand to vehicles with more premium content, and from sedans to crossover vehicles, could push revenues up. "The migration of high-end features such as cooling seats with massage functions to mass market vehicles and the growth of SUVs and CUVs should be big tailwinds for us," he said.

Several suppliers are announcing plans for intelligent seating solutions as a means of adding technology to the interiors market. Last week, Magna said that it is developing a smart auto seat capable of monitoring a driver’s heart rate to identify if the driver is feeling drowsy. Magna expects smart seats to play a key role in self-driving cars, where such vehicles will require monitoring devices to ensure drivers are ready to regain control when required. HELLA has also announced that it is working on technology capable of folding or unfolding an SUV's rear seats at the push of a button, integrating ambient lighting into vehicle seating and locks or unlocks turntable seats in autonomous vehicle.

Growth of the market in China

Lately, several OEMs have announced expansion plans in China, urging suppliers to expand their output. For instance, in April 2016, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles started production of the Jeep Renegade sport utility vehicle in China. In addition, Renault commenced production at its Wuhan plant in China's central Hubei province in February 2016. At full capacity, the factory could output 150,000 units per year.

IHS Automotive expects that demand for seat assembly in China will reach 85.5 million units in 2019, while demand in the next largest region, Europe, is anticipated to reach 73.3 million units. The seat adjusters market in China is also led by JCI, which has a strongly entrenched position among the Asian vehicle manufacturers. It supplies to a large number of vehicle manufacturers in China, including Shanghai-GM, Geely, Changan, FAW-Volkswagen, and Beijing Hyundai. 

Focus on core strategy benefits focus on a single product area

Johnson Controls, Inc. (JCI) decision to spin off Adient came as part of the Tyco merger, and is part of a greater industry trend of focusing on core strengths. One of the key reasons for splitting the seating and interiors business off from the rest of the company is the different cash and investment requirements of the automotive industry in general, compared with JCI’s other businesses. The separation of Adient was also the final part of its exit from automotive interiors. Having sold its headliner and sun visor business to Atlas Holdings, a private equity company in 2014, the company had sold its stake in its JV with Pricol of India to Pricol itself in May 2015.

Automakers' purchasing strategy for seats has changed over time; they prefer making bulk sourcing for seating parts. About five years ago, OEMs ordered approximately 70% of seats from one supplier. The remaining 30% was assembled from components purchased from a variety of vendors. The situation has now reversed as OEMs opt for standardised parts such as a common seat frame and seat cushion for all their vehicles. For instance, Mercedes-Benz and BMW use a common seat frame developed by JCI. This entire process results in considerable savings at the automakers’ end. 

For suppliers, it is an incredibly time- and capital-consuming effort to keep seating products equipped with the latest technologies. This is why the focus is being diverted to becoming a specialist supplier. As a result, tier-1 suppliers have been making large-scale acquisitions of suppliers in the automotive industry in the last couple of years, with some deals being comprised of “unit-only” acquisitions of large tier-ones (e.g. Grupo Antolin’s USD535 million deal for Magna’s interiors businesses in 2015). The entire interior components will likely be supplied in one integrated system by an interior “megasupplier”.  There are significant economies of scale by sourcing this way and big savings are being made for the seat system as a whole.

Contacts

Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.

THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.

The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.