While AAM appears to be receptive to the guidelines, the CTA termed the proposed guidelines as “disturbing” and “regulatory overreach”

Using phones for calling, texting and adjusting a vehicle’s radio or infotainment system while driving are fast emerging as one of the major factors resulting in distracted driving accidents across the globe. According to distraction.gov, an official US government website for distracted driving, 3,477 people were killed and nearly half a million were injured in the United States in 2015 alone due to distracted driving.  

As automakers equip their vehicles with features that enhance connectivity and user experience, incidents of distracted driving are set to rise in the coming years. In addition to automakers, consumers can also buy aftermarket devices which enhance the driver’s connectivity and user experience.. Therefore, it becomes the responsibilities of not only automakers but also aftermarket electronic device developers to develop features that curb distracted driving. Although automakers urge drivers to focus on the road while using such features during driving, they can only go so far in effecting driver behaviour.

Last month, in the United States, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released guidelines to help address driver distraction caused by mobiles and other portable electronic devices in vehicles. The proposed guidelines, which are voluntary, encourage aftermarket electronic device developers to design products in a way that curb driver distraction. The NHTSA urged aftermarket electronic device developers to include features such as pairing, in which a portable device is linked to a vehicle’s infotainment system, as well as Driver Mode – a simplified user interface.

Once a phone is paired with the vehicle’s interface most of its functions, including text entry for messaging, internet browsing, displaying social media content and video playing capabilities would be disabled. If pairing is not available or the driver is not willing to pair the device with the vehicle’s interface, the device should be put in Driver Mode. Once a phone is in Driver Mode, it creates a simplified interface making most of the other features unavailable to the driver. NHTSA believes both features offer significant potentials in reducing driver distraction by limiting the time a driver’s eyes are off the road.

The NHTSA’s announcement last month covers the second phase of voluntary guidelines to address distracted driving on US roads. The safety regulator’s first phase of guidelines in 2013 targeted electronic devices or systems that automakers offer as original equipment (OE) fitment in their vehicles and focused on reducing distraction that involved visual-manual interaction. The guidelines proposed that the interface of these devices should be simplified in order to reduce driver distraction.

The first phase guidelines asserted that a vehicle’s OE device, from navigation to the radio, should have an interface that minimizes the driver's glances away from the road to no more than two seconds. The guidelines go on to say that the sum of the time it takes to look away from the road and complete a task while driving should not exceed 12 seconds. It also suggested OEMs disable several operations, such as manual texting, video calling or conferencing and display of certain type of text including text messages, web pages, social media content, unless the vehicle is stopped and parked.

The NHTSA’s second phase guideline applies its first phase recommendations to the visual-manual interface of portable and aftermarket devices. Thus pairing would ensure that the task performed by the driver while driving would meet the time-based, eye-glance task acceptance criteria specified in the first phase guidelines. In case of the Driver Mode too, the device should lock out tasks that do not meet first phase task acceptance criteria or are among the specified lock-outs. NHTSA said that it is considering combining the two phase guidelines into a single document when the second phase is finalized. The safety regulator is seeking public opinion on its latest proposed guidelines.  

The NHTSA’s latest guidelines have received mixed reactions from automakers and others. The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM), whose members include major automakers operating in the United States, such as BMW, FCA, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi Motors, Toyota and Volvo Cars, appeared to be receptive to the guidelines. Wade Newton, a spokesperson of the AAM, said that the association would carefully review these guidelines. “We believe it’s important to encourage drivers to use in-vehicle systems rather than handheld personal electronic devices that were not engineered for use in the driving environment,” Newton said.

However, the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), the trade association, which claims to have 2200 members and organizes the CES conference every year, described the proposed guidelines on driver distraction from electronic devices as “disturbing” and “regulatory overreach”. Gary Shapiro, president and CEO of CTA, said that rather than focusing on devices which could reduce drunk driving, the regulator has chosen to exceed their actual authority and regulate almost every portable device. According to him, this regulatory overreach could thwart the innovative solutions and technologies that help drivers make safer decisions from ever coming to market.

The latest guidelines by NHTSA, however, fall short of a complete ban on mobile device use by drivers favored by the United States National Transportation Safety Board, which investigates accidents and issues recommendations, but can’t make rules. “While it is helpful to have some guidance, it’s a day late and a dollar short,” said Deborah Hersman, president and CEO of the National Safety Council, stressing there is a “need for a smart solution, not feel-good guidelines”.

The NTHSA has chosen the middle path in its guidelines. Whether the US safety regulator is within its rights to come with guidelines that impact other industries is debatable, its intention to curb distracted driving should not be doubted. However, mere guidelines might not be enough to curb distracted driving, which is expected to increase in the coming years.

Contacts

Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.

THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.

The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.