Source: Getty Images/deepblue4you
The European Commission estimates that the share of Chinese EVs sold in Europe has risen to 8% and could reach 15% by 2025
The European Commission has launched an anti-subsidy investigation to figure out whether it should impose punitive tariffs on cheaper Chinese electric vehicles in an attempt to guard European carmakers, according to a news report published by Reuters on September 13.
Several China-based EV makers such as Nio, BYD, SAIC, XPeng, Geely and FAW, among others, have been lately expanding their presence across Europe by setting up retail stores. The commission estimates that Chinese EVs are cheaper compared to the EVs produced by European carmakers as they benefited from state subsidies.
“Global markets are now flooded with cheaper electric cars. And their price is kept artificially low by huge state subsidies. Europe is open to competition. Not for a race to the bottom,” the report said, citing European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
Furthermore, the report said that the commission will have up to 13 months to study and evaluate the impact of cheaper EVs imported into Europe from China, and whether it should levy tariffs in addition to the standard 10% EU rate for cars. It can be recalled that the commission had launched a similar investigation against Chinese companies exporting solar panels to Europe a decade ago.
Interestingly, the anti-subsidy investigation covers battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) produced in China, including non-Chinese brands such as Tesla, Renault and BMW.
Significance: The European Commission estimates that the share of Chinese EVs sold in Europe has risen to 8% and could reach 15% by 2025. The commission has noted that the prices of these EVs are typically 20% below the EU-made models.
In response to the announcement from the commission, the Chinese Chamber of Commerce to the EU said it was concerned and opposed to the said investigation. The report added that the Chinese Chamber of Commerce has objected to EU’s unfair protectionism and said that the emerging EV sector's competitive advantage was not due to the subsidies.
Further, Germany's VDA auto association has raised concern on a possible rebound from China, which could spiral into a new trade war between the two regions. Instead, the association has advised the commission to focus on creating a conducive environment for European players to succeed, ranging from lowering electricity tariffs to reducing bureaucratic hurdles.
It is to be noted that Germany's car industry heavily relies on the Chinese market for a significant proportion of its sales. The auto industry has long advocated keeping the trade doors open with China, the Reuters report stated.
It is known that China had terminated its generous 11-year subsidy scheme for EV purchases in 2022, but some local authorities have continued to offer aid or tax rebates to attract more investments.
AutoTechInsight has launched BriefCASE, a new and free weekly newsletter. Giving you the inside track on all things related to CASE and hot technologies as they relate to the automotive supply chain. Click here to subscribe.
Copyright © 2025 S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.
These materials, including any software, data, processing technology, index data, ratings, credit-related analysis, research, model, software or other application or output described herein, or any part thereof (collectively the “Property”) constitute the proprietary and confidential information of S&P Global Inc its affiliates (each and together “S&P Global”) and/or its third party provider licensors. S&P Global on behalf of itself and its third-party licensors reserves all rights in and to the Property. These materials have been prepared solely for information purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable.
Any copying, reproduction, reverse-engineering, modification, distribution, transmission or disclosure of the Property, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of S&P Global. The Property shall not be used for any unauthorized or unlawful purposes. S&P Global’s opinions, statements, estimates, projections, quotes and credit-related and other analyses are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security, and there is no obligation on S&P Global to update the foregoing or any other element of the Property. S&P Global may provide index data. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. The Property and its composition and content are subject to change without notice.
THE PROPERTY IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS. NEITHER S&P GLOBAL NOR ANY THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS (TOGETHER, “S&P GLOBAL PARTIES”) MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE PROPERTY’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE PROPERTY WILL OPERATE IN ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION, NOR ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO ITS ACCURACY, AVAILABILITY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS, OR TO THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. S&P GLOBAL PARTIES SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE LIABLE TO ANY RECIPIENT FOR ANY INACCURACIES, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE. Without limiting the foregoing, S&P Global Parties shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with the Property, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on or relating to the Property. In no event shall S&P Global be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses (including without limitation lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Property even if advised of the possibility of such damages. The Property should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.
The S&P Global logo is a registered trademark of S&P Global, and the trademarks of S&P Global used within this document or materials are protected by international laws. Any other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
The inclusion of a link to an external website by S&P Global should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the website's owners (or their products/services). S&P Global is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. S&P Global keeps certain activities of its divisions separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain divisions of S&P Global may have information that is not available to other S&P Global divisions. S&P Global has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P Global may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P Global reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P Global Ratings’ public ratings and analyses are made available on its sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge) and www.capitaliq.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P Global publications and third party redistributors.